Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Global Schmoes

Upon first hearing about global warming I tended to believe that it might be true. As the years passed and I looked at some of the proponents for global warming I began to be skeptical. First, there was Al “Saddam should be ousted” Gore. Al Gore made a movie about global warming that must have raked in a pretty sum of money for an already wealthy patrician. Then there are the scientists working for the UN. Proponents for global warming have always held up these computer model wielding savants spluttering about their veracity and asking the same question “how could so many be wrong?” Well, the UN is nothing but the pet poodle for the US government as witness their giving the okay for the US and European “powers” to attack Libya under the auspices of humanitarian reasons. The main one being “protecting” civilian lives. Today we know that NATO bombed the living daylights out of Libya resulting in much destruction and as many as 50,000 deaths with more occurring every day thanks to the inevitable fighting resulting from the power vacuum caused by NATO’s typically horrific and brutal wars against innocent civilians. This is the same UN that global warming enthusiasts have held up as sterling and unimpeachable champions of truth, along with their “computer models.” Perhaps our global warming champions of truth, justice, and the American way should have been more careful about their sources.

There are other reasons I have been skeptical but shall refrain from stating them as global warmers always have their pat and ready answers which as it turns out are a lot of pap. Dr. David Evans has compared the computer model predictions to actual NASA satellite data and lo and behold the computer models are so erroneous that it is entirely laughable. Evans concludes…

via Link

1.The climate models are fundamentally flawed. Their assumed threefold amplification by feedbacks does not in fact exist.

2.The climate models overestimate temperature rises due to CO2 by at least a factor of three.

But please, do not take my word for it and go read the entire article complete with graphs and background information on Evans. And no, you won’t be seeing this information in the main stream news though no doubt the same people who know the worth of the main stream news shall set aside what they know about it for their beloved global warming just as they have set aside what they know to be true about the UN when they hold up their “scientists” as the epitome of “good” science. For myself I regard them as charlatans who have found themselves a nice comfy and secure not to mention well paying job who fan the flames of global warming fanatics around the globe (no pun intended). And if you believe that all scientists are great men and women that are naught but seekers of truth on the shores of the universe you need to wake up from your day dreams. Who do you think works for the so-called defense industry that has inundated the world with their weapons of destruction and earn a pretty penny doing so?